Skip to main content
English
Spanish

Translating step 7

Step 7
Only mild adhesive secures the battery pack, which we can dig out without using any heat. (Granted, the 90° F / 32° C weather here may have helped). Our little friend is rated at  a sober 1.3 Wh (340 mAh @ 3.85 V)—but with a claimed 2-day battery life, maybe Samsung just isn't concerned about winning the smartwatch battery spec war. This puts it behind the original Galaxy Watch (1.81 Wh), and the Huawei Watch GT (1.56 Wh), but still ahead of the 44 mm Apple Watch Series 5 (1.129 Wh).
  • Only mild adhesive secures the battery pack, which we can dig out without using any heat. (Granted, the 90° F / 32° C weather here may have helped).

  • Our little friend is rated at a sober 1.3 Wh (340 mAh @ 3.85 V)—but with a claimed 2-day battery life, maybe Samsung just isn't concerned about winning the smartwatch battery spec war.

  • This puts it behind the original Galaxy Watch (1.81 Wh), and the Huawei Watch GT (1.56 Wh), but still ahead of the 44 mm Apple Watch Series 5 (1.129 Wh).

  • We half expected to find a novel battery design with a metal pouch—but so far, Apple seems to be the only watchmaker experimenting with that.

Sólo un adhesivo suave asegura el paquete de baterías, que podemos sacar sin usar nada de calor. (En realidad, el clima de 32º C aquí puede haber ayudado).

Nuestro amiguito tiene un índice de 1.27 Wh (340 mAh @ 3,85 V), pero con una vida de batería de 2 días, quizás Samsung no esté preocupado por ganar la guerra de las especificaciones de las baterías de los relojes inteligentes.

Esto lo pone detrás del Galaxy Watch original (1.81 Wh), y del Huawei Watch GT (1.56 Wh), pero aún por delante del Apple Watch Series 5 de 44 mm (1.129 Wh).

Esperábamos encontrar un nuevo diseño de batería con una bolsa de metal, pero hasta ahora, Apple parece ser el único relojero que está experimentando con eso.

Your contributions are licensed under the open source Creative Commons license.