4
Score
marknee
49
Asked
Maximum RAM
What is the maximum RAM you can install in a MacBook Unibody A1278?
Edited by: Sterling Hirsh ( )
4
Score
mayer
148.1k
Answered
There are six machines in the A1278 Model. Some will take a maximum of 6 GB of RAM and some will take 8. So Bac is the only one here that gave a correct answer. Machine identification is critical and answers given without that information are just guesses.
UPDATE - I talked to my RAM supplier yesterday. He said that with using different sized chips you loose RAM interleaving and they should be installed in matched pairs for best performance.
using different sized chips you loose RAM interleaving and they should be installed in matched pairs for best performance. I've looked at actual benchmarking tests. The improvement is so small as to be insignificant for most purposes. Better to have more RAM, and its attendant benefits, than to keep a smaller amount in the mistaken belief of a non-interleaving performance hit.
If your model can utilize 6GB you can also get the benefits from interleaving by installing 2 X 4GB, even if it only uses 6GB.
asle,
There's these: http://eshop.macsales.com/Reviews/MacBoo... http://eshop.macsales.com/Reviews/Framew... http://www.mackb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/mac-... Here's one where the last post claims you can discern a difference in computers where the system RAM is shared with the graphics (like the MacBook): http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readfl... Google is your friend. I can't remember the original thing I read, which was a year or three ago... Other World's test were actual usage, not benchmarks.
2
Score
bac
5.2k
Answered
according to various sources, including this one, and also Mactracker, you CAN install up to 6GB of RAM in the MacBook Unibody A1278 (aka MacBook Late 2008)
the same source mentioned above also mentions that real-world testing shows an almost negligible performance difference running match RAM modules vs running 2GB + 4GB
2
Score
Answered
i would recommend to go with 4 GB as recommended from Apple, I installed 8 GB and didn't noticed significant difference.
Whether or not more RAM will benefit you depends completely on your usage. I have my Mac mini maxed out at 8 GB, and I wish I could stuff more in there--I get a lot of pageouts, depending on what applications I have open. In general, it behooves one to install as much RAM as one can afford. Especially if one uses Adobe or other memory-hungry apps.
Edited by: colleenthompson ( )
2
Score
Answered
Hi guys, this is what i read in everymac.com regarding the max RAM you can put on A1278. I hope it works. I will give it a try with 8GB:
"Apple officially supports a maximum of 4 GB of RAM. Originally, this model was only unofficially capable of stably supporting 6 GB of RAM, but as confirmed by site sponsor OWC, it is capable of supporting 8 GB of RAM if updated to Boot ROM Version MB51.007D.B03 and running MacOS X 10.6 "Snow Leopard" or higher"
Martin
1
Score
rj713
39k
Answered
Apple says 4 GB but some people have installed 6 GB. A 2GB and a 4GB.
Ralph
that's not a good idea however, as for the best performance you should have balanced ram (eg. equal values in both slots), this has also been known to cause kernel panics.
Mactracker specs it at "6gb actual, 4gb Apple". "Best performance" can be subjective. Interleaving only provides small gains (on the order of 5-8%) in the tests I found, most of which aren't very current, it's true. But most users are unlikely to notice any difference. I don't know if the MacBook even has interleaved memory busses. My personal opinion would be that the extra memory far outweighs any possible improvement from interleaving.
1
Score
Daniel
37
Answered
1
Score
Daniel
37
Answered
1
Score
H V
13
Answered
1
Score
Answered
1
Score
DiPa
13
Answered
0
Score
H V
13
Answered
0
Score
walczyk
1
Answered
0
Score
Answered
0
Score
Answered
0
Score
antonio
1
Answered
0
Score
H V
13
Answered
0
Score
ohmyguo
1
Answered
0
Score
antonio
1
Answered
0
Score
DiPa1
1
Answered
0
Score
Answered
My Wife has a MBP Unibody 13" 2.26 GHz (Mid 2009) and it's slow when she uses Aperture if she then opens Parallels the machine becomes unusable. We have 4 GB in it now [2x2gb] and the spec sheet says thats all it will take but I have seen hints of a possibility that the machine may accept up to 8 Can anyone confirm ? and if it can't, are their settings in Aperture or Parallels to make them less of memory hogs?
0
Score
Answered
0
Score
antonio
1
Answered
0
Score
Answered
0
Score
Dan
6.1k
Answered
Here's part of a write up I found on memory, hope it helps.
If you look back when your system (desktop or laptop) was introduced and looked at what memory was available you would have noted the memory modules were quite large physically from what we have today.
- Cost was high for any of the larger memory SIMMs
- The I/O speeds were not as fast as what we have today
- Power and heat was a big problem
While desktops had plenty of power, laptops didn't so it was not uncommon for laptops to have less memory or was limited due to the heat buildup and running time.
Today things are much better even for older systems!
- With super high density chips now being used in SIMMs the power and heat issues are a thing of the past.
- Memory limits placed by the laptop manufactures to meet their usage claims (how long you use your laptop) is no longer the the killer.
- Memory cost have also dropped (not as fast as hard drives though) so more people are willing to buy more.
Guidance:
- With newer high performance systems interleaved memory is more important (Vs straight I/O).
- If you have an older technology SIMM (larger chipped) in your system its best to throw it away if you're in the process of adding memory.
- Use a matched set (bought together) when ever possible. Mixing older tech SIMMS with newer tech SIMMs often make an unstable system.
- Always check your firmware (BIOS/PRAM/vPRA
0
Score
ronf57
1
Answered
I installed 8GB (2x4GB) in my 2ghz core duo A1278 and changed the 160GB Hard drive to a momentus hybrid 500Gb and the laptop was screaming fast in comparision to the pre-updates system.
It identifies ALL 8GBof memory and it runs statistical analysis regressions faster than my Quad core i-7 920 running at 2.8GHZby a factor of about 6-10 times.
I ran all the database and merging processes on the i-7 then ported the data out to the macbook to run the regressions. I couldn't believe the performance difference between the two systems. The i-7 has 12GB ddr3 1600mhz memory and 7200 rpm drives.
So yes the upgrades to the mac book were worth the investment.
Only thing faster is current generation processors (>2.5Ghz i-5/i-7) with full SSD drives.